Photos télé objectif 100-400 série L Canon

[groux]

Mouais. J'ai cliqué un lien au hasard. Le mec qui se plaint a mis un filtre Optex UV (connais pas) à 10$.

De toute manière, même à supposer que le 100-400 soit sensible aux filtres, c'est pas en mettant un bas de gamme que ça va s'arranger.

C'est clair.

Mais je confirme que le 100-400 est particulièrement sensible.

Canon 100-400 uv filter? - BirdForum
je cites:
"Had mine 5 years no problem apart form when i first got it and put a uv filter on and nearly sent the lens back it was so bad , the filter was a hoya pro digital one "


Canon 100-400 L doesn't like filters: Canon SLR Lens Talk Forum: Digital Photography Review
"I've had a Canon 100-400 L for a year or so and love except that it goes all soft-focus on me as soon as I put a filter on it. No filter, it's pin sharp. Put even a Hoya Pro 1 UV filter on it and the results are dreadful, literally unusable"


Be careful, 100-400 not good with UV filter...: Canon SLR Lens Talk Forum: Digital Photography Review
"I used to have the 100-400 for few years. .........I found even high quality B+W MRC UV actually degrade the optical performance of 100-400 "

Et plein d'autres.
De toutes façon, le pare-soleil, étant donné sa forme est une très bonne protection, qui elle, est parfaitement neutre.