boitier ou caillou? 450d+1755IS2.8/Pack50d

[Arcamenel]

Je ne voulais pas revenir sur la question, mais puisqu'un autre y revient...

Lis cette page. Si tu as la flemme, voici les passages :

- My Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Lens is slightly sharper in the center at 17mm wide open, but the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens is sharper at all other tested focal lengths - and proved much sharper in the corners at all focal lengths and apertures. Distortion was also less on the 17-55.

- Similar story with the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 L USM Lens. The Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens is sharper at all other tested focal lengths - and proved much sharper in the corners at all focal lengths and apertures. At close distances, the 17-40 had sharper corners and held its sharpness to a narrower focal length than the 17-55. Lower barrel distortion at the wide end is also in the 17-55's favor.

- At all overlapping focal lengths and apertures, the 17-55 is sharper than my Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM Lens.


Je ne faisais que dire ce que je lis (je ne suis pas de langue maternelle anglaise, mais si je suis nul à ce point en reading, qu'on me le dise !). Et je pense que ce site peut être pris comme référence, au même point que photozone ou slr.

Et je pense qu'opposer à mes dires un exemple aussi stupide n'est pas franchement malin non plus... Désolé.