Affichage des résultats 1 à 31 sur 31
Discussion: 70-200mm f2,8 is ou 70-200mm f4 is ?
Mode arborescent
-
02/10/2008, 21h22 #21
- Inscription
- décembre 2006
- Localisation
- Métropole Lilloise
- Âge
- 54
- Messages
- 277
- Boîtier
- 1D Mark III - 350 D
- Objectif(s)
- EF 16-35 2.8L + EF 24-70 2.8L + EF 50 1.8 II + EF 28-200 3.5-5.6 + EFS 18-55
... Et voici la conclusion pour le f4 IS :
"Every now and then EOS, the goddess of mercy, seems to speak to the Canon lens designers and this time they listened carefully. The Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 USM L IS may well be the very best tele zoom on the market today - it is certainly the best Canon zoom lens tested locally to date. The lens was capable to deliver a near-flawless performance is all categories. The resolution figures are stunning regardless of the setting. Distortions, vignetting and CAs are nothing to worry about. The build quality is excellent with the new sealing as a another highlight. On top of that the lens now features a image stabilizer with an efficiency equivalent to 4 f-stops (at cost of shutter speed). The only heartbreaking drawback for some is the price tag which increased significantly to a whopping grand - price/performance-wise this is still very sound though. "
Informations de la discussion
Utilisateur(s) sur cette discussion
Il y a actuellement 1 utilisateur(s) naviguant sur cette discussion. (0 utilisateur(s) et 1 invité(s))
Discussions similaires
-
70-200mm f4 IS ou f2.8
Par stewart dans le forum Discussions ObjectifsRéponses: 30Dernier message: 19/02/2008, 06h16 -
EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS - Probleme de MAP
Par Alexevana dans le forum Discussions ObjectifsRéponses: 35Dernier message: 22/01/2008, 20h05 -
Canon 28-200mm ou Sigma 18-200mm que me conseillez vous
Par fr92fab dans le forum Discussions ObjectifsRéponses: 7Dernier message: 20/06/2007, 21h15 -
EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM
Par Ritchie dans le forum Discussions ObjectifsRéponses: 7Dernier message: 22/04/2005, 08h05 -
200mm f/2,8 L USM Vs 70-200mm f/2,8 (sigma)
Par Jibs dans le forum Discussions ObjectifsRéponses: 2Dernier message: 06/02/2005, 21h05