70-200 4L IS USM ou 100 2.8 L macro + 200 2.8L

[ikari]

On parle bien du 100 "L"?

Car sur le non-L ça à l'air de passer, mais sur le "L", il y a des commentaires négatifs. Exemple ici: NatureScapes.Net • View topic - Canon 100/2.8L IS- First impressions

Je cite "mounted to the 100L IS causes immediate problems with both the autofocus and IF mechanisms. Focus racks in and out, IS mechanism shakes uncontrollably"